data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c27e3/c27e3ea07544aa0e7d74f17c54b4be9792ab3266" alt=""
Commodities are of course the hot new asset class, and as a born contrarian I'm bound to think it's all bunk. Naturally, it would be good to come to a slightly more reasoned conclusion, so I have lately done a lot of reading about how this asset class works.
There are essentially two ways to invest in commodities: physically, and through futures trading.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98e4e/98e4e7a31ab088f85cbdc927ac5feb15e004775a" alt=""
At any rate, actually burying gold or oil in your backyard does not appear to be a winning strategy. The other option is trading commodities futures. This turns out to be a pretty complicated game with its own rules that have little overlap with equity or debt markets. Which is why I find myself agreeing with Barron's that we may be seeing a bubble in the commodities futures markets that has little to do with the real supply and demand situation for the underlying products. Naive commodities speculators and institutional investors who read a white paper and decide they need 5% of their assets in commodities can now immediately and easily invest in an ETF. I doubt if all these people put in the effort required to understand exactly what it is they are investing in (MBS and auction-rate securities anyone?).
This is not meant to imply that investing in commodities futures over the long-term is not a potentially viable strategy. In fact, from the academic research I've read it absolutely is. I simply think that even the best strategy will produce subpar results when implemented at the height of a bubble.
No comments:
Post a Comment